本校學位論文庫
CITYU Theses & Dissertations
論文詳情
黄新
王盈娟
國際旅遊與管理學院
國際款待與旅遊業管理碩士學位課程 (中文學制)
碩士
2022
殘障人士參與休閒運動結伴行爲, 休閒涉入程度, 心流體驗與幸福感之關聯討論 : 以惠州為例
A study on the relationship between companionate behavior, leisure involvement, flow experience and well-being among people with disabilities : Take disable people in Huizhou as an example
殘障人士 ; 結伴行爲 ; 涉入程度 ; 幸福感
People with Disabilities ; Companionate Behavior ; Leisure Involvement ; Flow Experience,Well-being
公開日期：19/5/2026
根據中國人口普查數據推算，我國殘障人口預估 8500 萬。隨著社會不斷發展，人民的生活水平不斷提高。當然殘障人士與社會其他成員相同，是精神和物質的創造者，由於生理、心理障礙以及無障礙環境設施建設不完善等諸多因素，導致殘障人士的出行困難。因此，他們迫切需要平等的參與社會生活,實現個人價值，其中休閒運動能恢復殘障人士的身體心靈健康。这是因为他们能認識志同道合的朋友結伴出行，並在運動過程中發現追求並達到目標獲得成就感，從而感受生活的美好。故本研究目的在於探索殘障人士運動的結伴行爲、涉入程度、心流體驗與幸福感之關係。
本研究使用定量問卷調查方式，以廣東省惠州市常駐當地的持證肢體殘障三级、肢體殘障四級以及因精神因素或其他因素导致行动不便的殘障人士為研究對象，共發放 290 份問卷，回收有效 209 份，回收率約爲 72.1%，研究發現結伴行爲與涉入程度、心流體驗有相關與影響關係，心流體驗在涉入程度與幸福感關係中成調節作用，並針對研究結果，提出學術與社會相關建議。
本研究使用定量問卷調查方式，以廣東省惠州市常駐當地的持證肢體殘障三级、肢體殘障四級以及因精神因素或其他因素导致行动不便的殘障人士為研究對象，共發放 290 份問卷，回收有效 209 份，回收率約爲 72.1%，研究發現結伴行爲與涉入程度、心流體驗有相關與影響關係，心流體驗在涉入程度與幸福感關係中成調節作用，並針對研究結果，提出學術與社會相關建議。
According to the Chinese census data, China's disabled population is estimated to be 85 million. Along with the continuous development of the society, the people's living standards will be also improved. Certainly, the disabled people in this society, as other members of society, require the needs of spiritual and material materials. Facing barrier-free environmental facilities imperfect construction and other factors, it results the difficulty of travelling for those disabled people with physical and psychological obstacles. Therefore, participating in social life and achieving personal values are also urgent needs to them. Leisure sports, particularly can restore the physical and mental health of the disabled people. It is because they can meet like-minded friends to play sports together, and find a sense of achievement in pursuing and achieving goals in the process of sports, so as to feel the beauty of life. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between the companionship, involvement, flow experience and well-being of people with disabilities.
This study used quantitative questionnaire survey to take the certified physical disability level 3, physical disability level 4 and disabled people with mobility difficulties due to mental factors or other factors as the research subjects, a total of 290 questionnaires were issued, 209 were effectively recovered, and the recovery rate was about 72.1%, and the study found that companionship was related and affected by the degree of involvement and flow experience, and the flow experience played a regulating role in the relationship between involvement degree and well-being, and made relevant suggestions based on the research results to academic and industrial fields.
This study used quantitative questionnaire survey to take the certified physical disability level 3, physical disability level 4 and disabled people with mobility difficulties due to mental factors or other factors as the research subjects, a total of 290 questionnaires were issued, 209 were effectively recovered, and the recovery rate was about 72.1%, and the study found that companionship was related and affected by the degree of involvement and flow experience, and the flow experience played a regulating role in the relationship between involvement degree and well-being, and made relevant suggestions based on the research results to academic and industrial fields.
2023
中文
85
答辯委員審議通過表 I
論文原創聲明 II
致謝 III
摘要 IV
Abstract V
圖目錄 XI
表目錄 XII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與意義 2
1.3 研究空白 3
1.4 研究貢獻 3
1.5 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻綜述 6
2.1結伴行爲 6
2.1.1結伴行爲的概念 6
2.1.2結伴行為的測量 9
2.2休閒涉入 10
2.2.1休閒涉入概念 10
2.2.2休閒涉入程度之相關研究 12
2.2.3休閒涉入的測量 15
2.3心流體驗 15
2.3.1心流體驗概念 15
2.3.2心流體驗之相關研究 16
2.3.3心流體驗的測量 20
2.4幸福感 20
2.4.1幸福感的概念 20
2.4.2幸福感之相關研究 21
2.4.3幸福感的測量 25
第三章 研究方法 27
3.1研究架構與假設 27
3.2問卷設計 28
3.2.1個人基本資料 28
3.2.2結伴行為量表 29
3.2.3休閒涉入程度量表 30
3.2.4心流體驗量表 31
3.2.5幸福感量表 33
3.3調查範圍與對象 35
3.3.1問卷發放時間 35
3.3.2問卷發放地點 35
3.3.3研究對象及原因 35
3.3.4 研究方法及抽樣方法 36
3.4 預調研數據分析 37
3.4.1預調研數據描述 37
3.4.2預調研信度效度分析 39
3.5 分析方法 40
第四章 數據分析 42
4.1 受訪者背景資料分析 42
4.2 信度檢測 44
4.3 效度檢測 45
4.3.1 結伴行為之效度分析 46
4.3.2 涉入程度之效度分析 47
4.3.3 心流體驗之效度分析 49
4.3.4 幸福感之效度分析 51
4.4 結伴行為，涉入程度、心流體驗與幸福感之關聯 52
4.4.1 皮爾森相關分析 52
4.4.2 線性回歸分析 55
第五章 結論與建議 62
5.1 研究結論與假設驗證 62
5.1.1研究結論 62
5.1.2假设验证 63
5.2 研究發現 64
5.3 研究建議 66
5.3.1實際建議 66
5.3.2 後續研究建議 67
5.4 研究局限 68
參考文獻 69
作者簡歷 79
附錄：正式調查問卷 80
論文原創聲明 II
致謝 III
摘要 IV
Abstract V
圖目錄 XI
表目錄 XII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與意義 2
1.3 研究空白 3
1.4 研究貢獻 3
1.5 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻綜述 6
2.1結伴行爲 6
2.1.1結伴行爲的概念 6
2.1.2結伴行為的測量 9
2.2休閒涉入 10
2.2.1休閒涉入概念 10
2.2.2休閒涉入程度之相關研究 12
2.2.3休閒涉入的測量 15
2.3心流體驗 15
2.3.1心流體驗概念 15
2.3.2心流體驗之相關研究 16
2.3.3心流體驗的測量 20
2.4幸福感 20
2.4.1幸福感的概念 20
2.4.2幸福感之相關研究 21
2.4.3幸福感的測量 25
第三章 研究方法 27
3.1研究架構與假設 27
3.2問卷設計 28
3.2.1個人基本資料 28
3.2.2結伴行為量表 29
3.2.3休閒涉入程度量表 30
3.2.4心流體驗量表 31
3.2.5幸福感量表 33
3.3調查範圍與對象 35
3.3.1問卷發放時間 35
3.3.2問卷發放地點 35
3.3.3研究對象及原因 35
3.3.4 研究方法及抽樣方法 36
3.4 預調研數據分析 37
3.4.1預調研數據描述 37
3.4.2預調研信度效度分析 39
3.5 分析方法 40
第四章 數據分析 42
4.1 受訪者背景資料分析 42
4.2 信度檢測 44
4.3 效度檢測 45
4.3.1 結伴行為之效度分析 46
4.3.2 涉入程度之效度分析 47
4.3.3 心流體驗之效度分析 49
4.3.4 幸福感之效度分析 51
4.4 結伴行為，涉入程度、心流體驗與幸福感之關聯 52
4.4.1 皮爾森相關分析 52
4.4.2 線性回歸分析 55
第五章 結論與建議 62
5.1 研究結論與假設驗證 62
5.1.1研究結論 62
5.1.2假设验证 63
5.2 研究發現 64
5.3 研究建議 66
5.3.1實際建議 66
5.3.2 後續研究建議 67
5.4 研究局限 68
參考文獻 69
作者簡歷 79
附錄：正式調查問卷 80
1.Bellucci, G. (2020). Positive attitudes and negative expectations in lonely individuals [Article]. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 9, Article 18595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75712-3
2.Cai, W. J., McKenna, B., & Waizenegger, L. (2020). Turning It Off: Emotions in Digital-Free Travel [Article]. Journal of Travel Research, 59(5), 909-927, Article 0047287519868314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519868314
3.Carr, & Neil. (2002). Going with the flow: An assessment of the relationship between young people's leisure and holiday behaviour. Tourism Geographies, 4(2), 115-134.
4.Chang, & Hsuan, H. (2016). Gender differences in leisure involvement and flow experience in professional extreme sport activities. World Leisure Journal, 1-16.
5.Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424.
6.Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982).New Directions for Teaching and Learning.Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis.
8.Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow : the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
9.Ergenekon, Y., & Artar, T. M. (2019). An Ignored Period of Time for Adults with Developmental Disabilities: Leisure Time. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi.
10.Gerald, A. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 45(1), 142-143.
11.Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152-177.
12.Ho, C. H., & Peng, H. H. (2017). Travel motivation for Taiwanese hearing-impaired backpackers. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(4), 449-464.
13.Hoffman, E., Jiang, S., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Travel as a Catalyst of Peak Experiences Among Young Chinese Adults. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(4), 608-628.
14.Isoahola, S. E. (1980). The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Nutrition Journal, 13:46(1), 1-8.
15.Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Lemay, E. P., Muise, A., & Tskhay, K. O. (2018). Communal Motivation and Well-Being in Interpersonal Relationships: An Integrative Review and Meta-Analysis [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000133
16.Li, J. T., Zeng, B. G., & Li, P. Y. (2021). The Influence of Leisure Activity Types and Involvement Levels on Leisure Benefits in Older Adults [Article]. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 10, Article 659263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.659263
17.Liechty, T., Ribeiro, N. F., & Yarnal, C. M. (2009). \"I Traveled Alone, but Never Felt Alone\": An Exploration of the Benefits of an Older Women\"s Group Tour Experience. Tourism Review International, 13(1), 17-29.
18.Liu, S., Mou, Z. C., Xie, W. L., Zhang, C., Chen, Y. J., Guo, W., Zhang, X. C., & Zhang, L. (2019). The Effect of the Irreversible Inequality on Pro-social Behaviors of People With Disabilities [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 7, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00012
19.Matte, J., Fachinelli, A. C., De Toni, D., Milan, G. S., & Olea, P. M. (2021). Relationship between Leisure Involvement, Voluntary Simplicity, Leisure Satisfaction, and Experiential Consumption [Article; Early Access]. Leisure Sciences, 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021.2001703
20.Mcintyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15.
21.Olcar, D., Golub, T. L., & Rijavec, M. (2021). THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC FLOW IN STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT AND WELL-BEING [Article]. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(6), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.912
22.Russell, R. V. (2009). Pastimes: The context of contemporary leisure. Sagamore Publishing Llc, 346.
23.Shen, Liu, Wenlan, Xie, Shangfeng, Han, Zhongchen, Mou, Xiaochu, & Zhang. (2018). Social Interaction Patterns of the Disabled People in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology.
24.Silva, A., Sobreiro, P., & Monteiro, D. (2021). Sports Participation and Value of Elite Sports in Predicting Well-Being [Article]. Sports, 9(12), 10, Article 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9120173
25.Stone, M. J., Soulard, J., Migacz, S., & Wolf, E. (2018). Elements of Memorable Food, Drink, and Culinary Tourism Experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1121-1132.
26.Tao, H., Zhou, Q., Tian, D. J., & Zhu, L. M. (2022). The Effect of Leisure Involvement on Place Attachment: Flow Experience as Mediating Role [Article]. Land, 11(2), 21, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020151
27.Tao, L., & Wang, D. (2014). Social networks and joint/solo activity–travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 68(oct.), 18-31.
28.Veenhoven, & Ruut. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research.
29.Elaine Chiao Ling Yang (2021) What motivates and hinders people from travelling alone? A study of solo and non-solo travellers, Current Issues in Tourism, 24(17), 2458-2471
30.Zhao, T., & Grotz, J. (2019). The changing landscape of public service delivery systems for disabled people in China: a Shanghai case study [Editorial Material]. Disability & Society, 34(3), 498-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1556492
31.孔祥艷. (2017).流暢體驗與大學生體育運動堅持性關系的研究.福建體育科技(03), 56-57.
32.孔少華. (2019).從Immersion到Flow experience:“沉浸式傳播”的再認識.首都師範大學學報(社會科學版)(04),74-83.
33.王燕,李悅,＆金一波. (2010).幸福感研究綜述,心理研究(02),14-19.
34.王鳳嬌.（2013）.老人休閒活動類型與幸福感之研究－以竹山鎮老人會為例.未出版碩士論文，南開科技大學，臺灣南投.
35.王超. (2014).大學生流暢體驗對心理幸福感的影響.福建師大福清分校學報(S1),61-68.
36.邢蕓,汪斯斯. (2016).殘疾人就業:教育、殘疾程度和性別的影響. 教育與經濟(06),47-54+63.
37.李尚盈,董曄,陳軍. (2018).旅遊同伴選擇的社會文化效應.城市學刊 (05),68-74.
38.李琦,＆李含. (2019).論體育運動對殘障大學生心理健康的影響. 當代體育科技(34),181+183.
39.李新靜,朱怡婷,梁增賢,何昭麗,＆王松茂. (2022)。滑雪旅遊者心流體驗影響因素判別及模型構建研究.資源開發與市場.
40.肖潔. (2010).參加體育鍛煉後老年人主觀幸福感量表的修訂及試用研究(碩士學位論文,蘇州大學).
41.苗學玲,＆保繼剛. (2007).“眾樂樂”:旅遊虛擬社區“結伴旅行”之質性研究.旅遊學刊(08),48-54.
42.金宸宇. (2018).系統視角下殘障人士無障礙出行問題研究(碩士學位論文,廣西師範大學).
43.周俊.（2017）.問卷數據分析-破解SPSS的六類分析思路.電子工業出版社.
44.吳明隆. (2009).結構方程模組。重慶大學出版社.
45.吳遠,＆徐霄霆. (2014).獨生子女“結伴”行為的心理學分析.中國健康心理學雜志(03),479-481.
46.郭肇元.（2002）.休閒心流經驗、休閒體驗與身心健康之關係探討.
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32475
47.姚鵬. (2018).老年人幸福感與運動參與、身體自尊關系.陰山學刊(自然科學版)(04),41-44.
48.周奇美,＆張朝枝. (2018).因伴而遊,還是因遊而伴?——老年人出遊動機模型探索. 旅遊學刊(09),70-82.
49.郭啟貴,桑美玲,＆羅炯. (2019).老年人休閒動機、休閒涉入對休閒滿意度的影響.中國老年學雜志(06),1495-1499.
50.郭葉,＆孟林盛. (2020).運動參與對主觀幸福感影響的理論分析與實證探索. 晉中學院學報(03),89-94.
51.胡智興,方必基,＆劉彩霞. (2022).老年人娛樂活動方式參與情況與主觀幸福感的相關研究.情感讀本,(9):35-37.
52.相博元. (2022).新冠疫情時代下農村殘疾人社會救助困境研究. 南方論刊(08),52-55.
53.張姣. (2016).職業愛好與老年人幸福感的關係:成就感的仲介作用. 福建品質管理(17):293-295.
54.陳惠芳,張佳鑫,＆張玟. (2017).基於AHP的殘障人士旅遊體驗研究——以南京市為例.市場週刊(理論研究)(07),62-64.
55.閆靜. (2017).旅行社團隊遊客間互動的影響因素及其與滿意度的關係研究(博士學位論文,西北大學).
56.唐穎慧. (2019).結伴旅遊與老年人旅遊幸福感關系研究(博士學位論文,中南財經政法大學).
57.陶長江. (2020).境外殘障旅遊與無障礙旅遊研究進展與啟示. 旅遊學刊(03),127-142.
58.桑藝,＆陳珂. (2022).殘疾人社會保障問題及對策研究.就業與保障(07),82-84.
59.馬坤. (2022).寧夏殘疾人競技體育發展路徑研究(碩士學位論文,寧夏大學).
60.馬雄威. (2008). 線性回歸方程中多重共線性診斷方法及其實證分析. 華中農業大學學報：社會科學版(2), 5.
61.徐雄,彭飛,＆蘇群珍. (2022).時間成本、體育場所消費支出對個體參與體育運動的經濟考量.體育學刊(04),80-85.
62.張茫茫,傅江,劉潔,＆閆媚. (2022).面向殘障人群的城市公共交通出行服務研究.包裝工程(12),199-207.
63.黃唯佳,季天怡,＆郭文斌. (2015).基於主觀幸福感的城市老年人休閒活動探究.揚州教育學院學報(03),48-52.
64.黃瀟婷,＆劉春. (2016).旅遊同伴角色對旅遊者行為的制約影響——以香港海洋公園為例.人文地理(02),128-135.
65.許昌斌,李璽,＆謝嘉敏. (2019).休閒動機休閒活動涉入與幸福感研究——以澳門銀發族群為例.管理觀察(09),85-87.
66.程勵. (2021).殘疾人休閒涉入、休閒效益及其生活滿意度影響的復雜性結構.四川師範大學學報(自然科學版)(06),720-733+708.
67.楊小莉,＆馮衛紅. (2017).山西省旅遊流空間網絡結構特徵研究——基於不同出遊方式的比較.生產力研究(03),111-115.
68.楊宗友. (2017).運動熱情與主觀幸福感的關系:正向情緒的仲介效果. 重慶交通大學學報(社會科學版)(01),44-49.
69.楊正軒,＆殷進. (2022).冰雪旅遊情境下幸福感作用機制探究——環境恢復性感知的前因作用與遊客涉入的調節效應.資源開發與市場.
70.趙英. (2018).針對殘障人士的資訊無障礙影響因素研究.四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版)(05),84-93.
71.趙孟婭. (2019).社會臨場感視角下旅遊虛擬社區網路人際信任研究--以馬蜂窩“結伴”社區為例.江蘇:蘇州大學.
72.溫忠麟,侯傑泰, &張雷. (2005). 調節效應與仲介效應的比較和應用. 心理學報(2).
73.鄧鵬. (2006).心流:體驗生命的潛能和樂趣.遠程教育雜志(03),74-78.
74.劉松. (2016).休閒涉入對大學生壓力—幸福感的影響:結構關系研究. 常州工學院學報(05),70-76.
75.劉婷婷. (2020).運動心理學視角下流暢體驗的發展研究. 文體用品與科技(04),186-187.
76.劉慧乾. (2020).互聯網結伴自助旅遊者旅遊動機及其行為特徵研究(碩士學位論文,西安科技大學).
77.劉秀霞,＆王真真. (2021)。跑步參與者涉入程度對幸福感的影響：心理資本和流暢體驗的鏈式仲介作用. 武漢體育學院學報(09),67-73.
78.謝蓉蓉. (2016).《中國公民幸福感量表》的質量分析和實證研究(碩士學位論文,南昌大學).
79.龍江智,＆王蘇 (2013).深度休閒與主觀幸福感——基於中國老年群體的本土化研究.旅遊學刊(02),77-85.
80.龍潛穎,＆徐彤. (2022).旅遊同伴對個體旅遊體驗影響機制研究. 旅遊科學.
81.樸正漢. (2017).登山鍛煉者休閒涉入、休閒效益與主觀幸福感的關系.沈陽體育學院學報(03),82-88.
82.羅秋菊,＆胡思玥. (2019).互聯網結伴旅遊中旅遊者自我呈現的變化.旅遊學刊(09),90-100.
83.羅少薇,宋奇珊,王婷婷,郭亞平,＆施淑君. (2017).大學生“約遊”意願測度與分析——以成都高校為例. 現代商業(18),160-161.
84.惠州市殘疾人聯合會（2020）.2019年惠州市殘聯統計公報.通知公告.取自
http://www1.huizhou.gov.cn/pages/cms/hzcl/html/tzgg/ae63817e30b34327884132d8416e1813.html?cataId=54c30787ce204aee818110ef87118b79
85.翟振武.（2021）.國家統計局.第七次全國人口普查公報解讀.取自
http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/jd/sjjd2020/202105/t20210512_1817342.html
2.Cai, W. J., McKenna, B., & Waizenegger, L. (2020). Turning It Off: Emotions in Digital-Free Travel [Article]. Journal of Travel Research, 59(5), 909-927, Article 0047287519868314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519868314
3.Carr, & Neil. (2002). Going with the flow: An assessment of the relationship between young people's leisure and holiday behaviour. Tourism Geographies, 4(2), 115-134.
4.Chang, & Hsuan, H. (2016). Gender differences in leisure involvement and flow experience in professional extreme sport activities. World Leisure Journal, 1-16.
5.Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424.
6.Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982).New Directions for Teaching and Learning.Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis.
8.Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow : the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
9.Ergenekon, Y., & Artar, T. M. (2019). An Ignored Period of Time for Adults with Developmental Disabilities: Leisure Time. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi.
10.Gerald, A. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 45(1), 142-143.
11.Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152-177.
12.Ho, C. H., & Peng, H. H. (2017). Travel motivation for Taiwanese hearing-impaired backpackers. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(4), 449-464.
13.Hoffman, E., Jiang, S., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Travel as a Catalyst of Peak Experiences Among Young Chinese Adults. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(4), 608-628.
14.Isoahola, S. E. (1980). The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Nutrition Journal, 13:46(1), 1-8.
15.Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Lemay, E. P., Muise, A., & Tskhay, K. O. (2018). Communal Motivation and Well-Being in Interpersonal Relationships: An Integrative Review and Meta-Analysis [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000133
16.Li, J. T., Zeng, B. G., & Li, P. Y. (2021). The Influence of Leisure Activity Types and Involvement Levels on Leisure Benefits in Older Adults [Article]. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 10, Article 659263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.659263
17.Liechty, T., Ribeiro, N. F., & Yarnal, C. M. (2009). \"I Traveled Alone, but Never Felt Alone\": An Exploration of the Benefits of an Older Women\"s Group Tour Experience. Tourism Review International, 13(1), 17-29.
18.Liu, S., Mou, Z. C., Xie, W. L., Zhang, C., Chen, Y. J., Guo, W., Zhang, X. C., & Zhang, L. (2019). The Effect of the Irreversible Inequality on Pro-social Behaviors of People With Disabilities [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 7, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00012
19.Matte, J., Fachinelli, A. C., De Toni, D., Milan, G. S., & Olea, P. M. (2021). Relationship between Leisure Involvement, Voluntary Simplicity, Leisure Satisfaction, and Experiential Consumption [Article; Early Access]. Leisure Sciences, 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021.2001703
20.Mcintyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15.
21.Olcar, D., Golub, T. L., & Rijavec, M. (2021). THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC FLOW IN STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT AND WELL-BEING [Article]. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(6), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.912
22.Russell, R. V. (2009). Pastimes: The context of contemporary leisure. Sagamore Publishing Llc, 346.
23.Shen, Liu, Wenlan, Xie, Shangfeng, Han, Zhongchen, Mou, Xiaochu, & Zhang. (2018). Social Interaction Patterns of the Disabled People in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology.
24.Silva, A., Sobreiro, P., & Monteiro, D. (2021). Sports Participation and Value of Elite Sports in Predicting Well-Being [Article]. Sports, 9(12), 10, Article 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9120173
25.Stone, M. J., Soulard, J., Migacz, S., & Wolf, E. (2018). Elements of Memorable Food, Drink, and Culinary Tourism Experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1121-1132.
26.Tao, H., Zhou, Q., Tian, D. J., & Zhu, L. M. (2022). The Effect of Leisure Involvement on Place Attachment: Flow Experience as Mediating Role [Article]. Land, 11(2), 21, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020151
27.Tao, L., & Wang, D. (2014). Social networks and joint/solo activity–travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 68(oct.), 18-31.
28.Veenhoven, & Ruut. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research.
29.Elaine Chiao Ling Yang (2021) What motivates and hinders people from travelling alone? A study of solo and non-solo travellers, Current Issues in Tourism, 24(17), 2458-2471
30.Zhao, T., & Grotz, J. (2019). The changing landscape of public service delivery systems for disabled people in China: a Shanghai case study [Editorial Material]. Disability & Society, 34(3), 498-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1556492
31.孔祥艷. (2017).流暢體驗與大學生體育運動堅持性關系的研究.福建體育科技(03), 56-57.
32.孔少華. (2019).從Immersion到Flow experience:“沉浸式傳播”的再認識.首都師範大學學報(社會科學版)(04),74-83.
33.王燕,李悅,＆金一波. (2010).幸福感研究綜述,心理研究(02),14-19.
34.王鳳嬌.（2013）.老人休閒活動類型與幸福感之研究－以竹山鎮老人會為例.未出版碩士論文，南開科技大學，臺灣南投.
35.王超. (2014).大學生流暢體驗對心理幸福感的影響.福建師大福清分校學報(S1),61-68.
36.邢蕓,汪斯斯. (2016).殘疾人就業:教育、殘疾程度和性別的影響. 教育與經濟(06),47-54+63.
37.李尚盈,董曄,陳軍. (2018).旅遊同伴選擇的社會文化效應.城市學刊 (05),68-74.
38.李琦,＆李含. (2019).論體育運動對殘障大學生心理健康的影響. 當代體育科技(34),181+183.
39.李新靜,朱怡婷,梁增賢,何昭麗,＆王松茂. (2022)。滑雪旅遊者心流體驗影響因素判別及模型構建研究.資源開發與市場.
40.肖潔. (2010).參加體育鍛煉後老年人主觀幸福感量表的修訂及試用研究(碩士學位論文,蘇州大學).
41.苗學玲,＆保繼剛. (2007).“眾樂樂”:旅遊虛擬社區“結伴旅行”之質性研究.旅遊學刊(08),48-54.
42.金宸宇. (2018).系統視角下殘障人士無障礙出行問題研究(碩士學位論文,廣西師範大學).
43.周俊.（2017）.問卷數據分析-破解SPSS的六類分析思路.電子工業出版社.
44.吳明隆. (2009).結構方程模組。重慶大學出版社.
45.吳遠,＆徐霄霆. (2014).獨生子女“結伴”行為的心理學分析.中國健康心理學雜志(03),479-481.
46.郭肇元.（2002）.休閒心流經驗、休閒體驗與身心健康之關係探討.
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32475
47.姚鵬. (2018).老年人幸福感與運動參與、身體自尊關系.陰山學刊(自然科學版)(04),41-44.
48.周奇美,＆張朝枝. (2018).因伴而遊,還是因遊而伴?——老年人出遊動機模型探索. 旅遊學刊(09),70-82.
49.郭啟貴,桑美玲,＆羅炯. (2019).老年人休閒動機、休閒涉入對休閒滿意度的影響.中國老年學雜志(06),1495-1499.
50.郭葉,＆孟林盛. (2020).運動參與對主觀幸福感影響的理論分析與實證探索. 晉中學院學報(03),89-94.
51.胡智興,方必基,＆劉彩霞. (2022).老年人娛樂活動方式參與情況與主觀幸福感的相關研究.情感讀本,(9):35-37.
52.相博元. (2022).新冠疫情時代下農村殘疾人社會救助困境研究. 南方論刊(08),52-55.
53.張姣. (2016).職業愛好與老年人幸福感的關係:成就感的仲介作用. 福建品質管理(17):293-295.
54.陳惠芳,張佳鑫,＆張玟. (2017).基於AHP的殘障人士旅遊體驗研究——以南京市為例.市場週刊(理論研究)(07),62-64.
55.閆靜. (2017).旅行社團隊遊客間互動的影響因素及其與滿意度的關係研究(博士學位論文,西北大學).
56.唐穎慧. (2019).結伴旅遊與老年人旅遊幸福感關系研究(博士學位論文,中南財經政法大學).
57.陶長江. (2020).境外殘障旅遊與無障礙旅遊研究進展與啟示. 旅遊學刊(03),127-142.
58.桑藝,＆陳珂. (2022).殘疾人社會保障問題及對策研究.就業與保障(07),82-84.
59.馬坤. (2022).寧夏殘疾人競技體育發展路徑研究(碩士學位論文,寧夏大學).
60.馬雄威. (2008). 線性回歸方程中多重共線性診斷方法及其實證分析. 華中農業大學學報：社會科學版(2), 5.
61.徐雄,彭飛,＆蘇群珍. (2022).時間成本、體育場所消費支出對個體參與體育運動的經濟考量.體育學刊(04),80-85.
62.張茫茫,傅江,劉潔,＆閆媚. (2022).面向殘障人群的城市公共交通出行服務研究.包裝工程(12),199-207.
63.黃唯佳,季天怡,＆郭文斌. (2015).基於主觀幸福感的城市老年人休閒活動探究.揚州教育學院學報(03),48-52.
64.黃瀟婷,＆劉春. (2016).旅遊同伴角色對旅遊者行為的制約影響——以香港海洋公園為例.人文地理(02),128-135.
65.許昌斌,李璽,＆謝嘉敏. (2019).休閒動機休閒活動涉入與幸福感研究——以澳門銀發族群為例.管理觀察(09),85-87.
66.程勵. (2021).殘疾人休閒涉入、休閒效益及其生活滿意度影響的復雜性結構.四川師範大學學報(自然科學版)(06),720-733+708.
67.楊小莉,＆馮衛紅. (2017).山西省旅遊流空間網絡結構特徵研究——基於不同出遊方式的比較.生產力研究(03),111-115.
68.楊宗友. (2017).運動熱情與主觀幸福感的關系:正向情緒的仲介效果. 重慶交通大學學報(社會科學版)(01),44-49.
69.楊正軒,＆殷進. (2022).冰雪旅遊情境下幸福感作用機制探究——環境恢復性感知的前因作用與遊客涉入的調節效應.資源開發與市場.
70.趙英. (2018).針對殘障人士的資訊無障礙影響因素研究.四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版)(05),84-93.
71.趙孟婭. (2019).社會臨場感視角下旅遊虛擬社區網路人際信任研究--以馬蜂窩“結伴”社區為例.江蘇:蘇州大學.
72.溫忠麟,侯傑泰, &張雷. (2005). 調節效應與仲介效應的比較和應用. 心理學報(2).
73.鄧鵬. (2006).心流:體驗生命的潛能和樂趣.遠程教育雜志(03),74-78.
74.劉松. (2016).休閒涉入對大學生壓力—幸福感的影響:結構關系研究. 常州工學院學報(05),70-76.
75.劉婷婷. (2020).運動心理學視角下流暢體驗的發展研究. 文體用品與科技(04),186-187.
76.劉慧乾. (2020).互聯網結伴自助旅遊者旅遊動機及其行為特徵研究(碩士學位論文,西安科技大學).
77.劉秀霞,＆王真真. (2021)。跑步參與者涉入程度對幸福感的影響：心理資本和流暢體驗的鏈式仲介作用. 武漢體育學院學報(09),67-73.
78.謝蓉蓉. (2016).《中國公民幸福感量表》的質量分析和實證研究(碩士學位論文,南昌大學).
79.龍江智,＆王蘇 (2013).深度休閒與主觀幸福感——基於中國老年群體的本土化研究.旅遊學刊(02),77-85.
80.龍潛穎,＆徐彤. (2022).旅遊同伴對個體旅遊體驗影響機制研究. 旅遊科學.
81.樸正漢. (2017).登山鍛煉者休閒涉入、休閒效益與主觀幸福感的關系.沈陽體育學院學報(03),82-88.
82.羅秋菊,＆胡思玥. (2019).互聯網結伴旅遊中旅遊者自我呈現的變化.旅遊學刊(09),90-100.
83.羅少薇,宋奇珊,王婷婷,郭亞平,＆施淑君. (2017).大學生“約遊”意願測度與分析——以成都高校為例. 現代商業(18),160-161.
84.惠州市殘疾人聯合會（2020）.2019年惠州市殘聯統計公報.通知公告.取自
http://www1.huizhou.gov.cn/pages/cms/hzcl/html/tzgg/ae63817e30b34327884132d8416e1813.html?cataId=54c30787ce204aee818110ef87118b79
85.翟振武.（2021）.國家統計局.第七次全國人口普查公報解讀.取自
http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/jd/sjjd2020/202105/t20210512_1817342.html
