本校學位論文庫
CITYU Theses & Dissertations
論文詳情
吕昊
王盈娟
國際旅遊與管理學院
國際酒店管理碩士學位課程(中文學制)
碩士
2023
遊憩體驗, 親子關係與家庭凝聚力之研究 : 以濟南市中小學生親子遊為例
A Study on Recreational Experiences, Parent-Child Relationships, and Family Cohesion: A Case of Parent-Child Trips among Primary and Secondary School Students in Jinan City
中小學生 ; 親子遊 ; 家庭凝聚力; 顧客體驗理論; 社會互動理論 ; 親子遊目的地 ; 旅遊規劃
Primary and Secondary School Students ; Parent-Child Tourism ; Family Cohesion ; Customer Experience Theory ; Social Interaction Theory ; Parent-Child Tourism Destination ; Tourism Planning
公開日期：27/5/2027
本研究深入探討了遊憩體驗在培養和增強親子關係以及家庭凝聚力方面日益受到重視的作用。在快速變化的社會結構和日益增長的家庭多樣性背景下，理解遊憩體驗如何影響家庭成員之間的關係、提升家庭整體幸福感具有重要的現實意義。
本文聚焦於探討遊憩體驗、親子關係與家庭凝聚力之間的相互關係，基於顧客體驗理論和社會互動理論構建了研究模型，選擇以山東省濟南市為研究目的地，以山東省濟南市近一年內進行過親子游的中小學生家長為研究對象，採用了定量研究的方法，通過線上發放調查問卷的方式進行資料收集，對收集到的有效資料進行分析，將各個構念進行相關性分析，再通過結構方程模型進行擬合評估，進而驗證了假設。
研究結果顯示，遊憩體驗能夠顯著提升親子間的情感交流、相互信任和友誼型交往，進而增強家庭凝聚力。此外，情感交流、相互信任和友誼型交往在遊憩體驗與家庭凝聚力之間發揮了顯著的中介作用。研究對於政府在城市規劃和公共資源配置中的決策提供了理論支援，同時為旅遊業界提供了市場定位和產品設計的新方向，並為家長提供了親子遊的家庭教育價值。
本文聚焦於探討遊憩體驗、親子關係與家庭凝聚力之間的相互關係，基於顧客體驗理論和社會互動理論構建了研究模型，選擇以山東省濟南市為研究目的地，以山東省濟南市近一年內進行過親子游的中小學生家長為研究對象，採用了定量研究的方法，通過線上發放調查問卷的方式進行資料收集，對收集到的有效資料進行分析，將各個構念進行相關性分析，再通過結構方程模型進行擬合評估，進而驗證了假設。
研究結果顯示，遊憩體驗能夠顯著提升親子間的情感交流、相互信任和友誼型交往，進而增強家庭凝聚力。此外，情感交流、相互信任和友誼型交往在遊憩體驗與家庭凝聚力之間發揮了顯著的中介作用。研究對於政府在城市規劃和公共資源配置中的決策提供了理論支援，同時為旅遊業界提供了市場定位和產品設計的新方向，並為家長提供了親子遊的家庭教育價值。
This study delves into the increasingly valued role of recreation experience in cultivating and strengthening parent-child relationships and family cohesion. Against the backdrop of rapidly changing social structures and growing family diversity, understanding how recreation experience affects relationships among family members and enhances overall family happiness holds significant practical importance.
The research focuses on the interrelationships among recreation experience, parent-child relationships, and family cohesion. A research model is constructed based on customer experience theory and social interaction theory. Jinan City in Shandong Province is selected as the research destination, and parents of primary and secondary school students in Jinan City who have engaged in parent-child tourism within the past year are chosen as the research subjects. A quantitative research method is employed, and data is collected through online distribution of survey questionnaires. The collected valid data is analyzed, and the concepts are subjected to correlation analysis. Finally, these hypotheses were tested using structural equation software.
The results indicate that recreation experience can significantly enhance emotional communication, mutual trust, and friendship-type interactions between parents and children, thereby strengthening family cohesion. Additionally, emotional communication, mutual trust, and friendship-type interactions play a significant mediating role between recreation experience and family cohesion. The study provides theoretical support for government decisions in urban planning and public resource allocation,
offers new directions for market positioning and product design in the tourism industry, and delivers educational value for family education through parent-child tourism.
The research focuses on the interrelationships among recreation experience, parent-child relationships, and family cohesion. A research model is constructed based on customer experience theory and social interaction theory. Jinan City in Shandong Province is selected as the research destination, and parents of primary and secondary school students in Jinan City who have engaged in parent-child tourism within the past year are chosen as the research subjects. A quantitative research method is employed, and data is collected through online distribution of survey questionnaires. The collected valid data is analyzed, and the concepts are subjected to correlation analysis. Finally, these hypotheses were tested using structural equation software.
The results indicate that recreation experience can significantly enhance emotional communication, mutual trust, and friendship-type interactions between parents and children, thereby strengthening family cohesion. Additionally, emotional communication, mutual trust, and friendship-type interactions play a significant mediating role between recreation experience and family cohesion. The study provides theoretical support for government decisions in urban planning and public resource allocation,
offers new directions for market positioning and product design in the tourism industry, and delivers educational value for family education through parent-child tourism.
2024
中文
67
致 謝. III
執行摘要 . IV
Executive Abstract V
目 錄 VII
圖目錄 .X
表目錄 XI
第一章 緒論 .1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究問題與研究目的 3
1.2.1 研究問題 3
1.2.2 研究目的 .3
1.3 研究意義 .4
1.3.1 理論意義 4
1.3.2 現實意義 5
1.4 研究流程 6
第二章 理論基礎與文獻綜述 7
2.1 相關理論基礎. .7
2.1.1 顧客體驗理論 7
2.1.2 社會互動理論 8
2.2 文獻綜述 9
2.2.1 親子遊 .9
2.2.2 遊憩體驗 .9
2.2.3 親子關係 11
2.2.4 家庭凝聚力. 12
2.3 研究假設 13
2.3.1 遊憩體驗與親子關係相關研究 . 3
2.3.2 親子關係與家庭凝聚力相關研究 14
2.3.3 情感交流的中介作用 15
2.3.4 相互信任的中介作用 15
2.3.5 友誼型交往的中介作用 16
2.4 研究架構 17
第三章 研究方法 18
3.1 問卷設計. 18
3.2 量表設計 .. 19
3.2.1 遊憩體驗量表 19
3.2.2 親子關係量表 20
3.2.3 家庭凝聚力量表 21
3.3 問卷收集計劃 22
3.3.1 確立樣本數. 22
3.3.2 正式調研計畫 . 22
3.4 資料分析計劃 23
3.4.1 SPSS 數據分析 23
3.4.2 SmartPLS 數據分析 . 24
第四章 研究分析結果與討論 25
4.1 描述性統計分析 25
4.2 信度分析 27
4.2.1 心理體驗量表信度檢驗 . 28
4.2.2 環境體驗信度檢驗. 28
4.2.3 自我成長體驗信度檢驗 29
4.2.4 情感交流信度檢驗 30
4.2.5 相互信任信度檢驗 31
4.2.6 友誼型交往信度檢驗. 31
4.2.7 家庭凝聚力信度檢驗 . 32
4.3 效度分析 33
4.3.1 內容效度 33
4.3.2 結構效度 33
4.3.3 心理體驗效度分析 .. 34
4.3.4 環境體驗效度分析 35
4.3.5 自我成長體驗效度分析 . 35
4.3.6 情感交流效度分析 36
4.3.7 相互信任效度分析 36
4.3.8 友誼型交往效度分析. 37
4.3.9 家庭凝聚力效度分析 37
4.3.10 收斂效度 38
4.4 結構方程模型分析. 39
4.4.1 模型構建 . 40
4.4.2 結構方程模型運行結果 40
第五章 結論與討論 45
5.1 研究結論 45
5.1.1 遊憩體驗對與情感交流關係 . 45
5.1.2. 遊憩體驗與相互信任的關係 46
5.1.3 遊憩體驗與友誼型交往關係 47
5.1.4 情感交流與家庭凝聚力關係 48
5.1.5 相互信任與家庭凝聚力的關係 . 49
5.1.6 友誼型交往與家庭凝聚力關係 49
5.2 理論貢獻 50
5.3 實際貢獻. 51
5.3.1 對政府方面 51
5.3.2 對旅遊業者方面 51
5.3.3 對家長方面 52
5.4 建議 52
5.4.1 建設更多的親子遊憩設施 52
5.4.2 制定促進親子遊支持計畫 52
5.4.3 加強宣傳促進家庭親子活動 53
5.4.4 提升景區綜合服務品質 53
5.4.5 設計適合多代共遊的產品 54
5.4.6 注重家庭互動體驗 . 54
5.4.7 合理安排親子遊行程時長 54
5.5 研究局限 55
參考文獻 56
作者簡歷 61
附 錄. 62
執行摘要 . IV
Executive Abstract V
目 錄 VII
圖目錄 .X
表目錄 XI
第一章 緒論 .1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究問題與研究目的 3
1.2.1 研究問題 3
1.2.2 研究目的 .3
1.3 研究意義 .4
1.3.1 理論意義 4
1.3.2 現實意義 5
1.4 研究流程 6
第二章 理論基礎與文獻綜述 7
2.1 相關理論基礎. .7
2.1.1 顧客體驗理論 7
2.1.2 社會互動理論 8
2.2 文獻綜述 9
2.2.1 親子遊 .9
2.2.2 遊憩體驗 .9
2.2.3 親子關係 11
2.2.4 家庭凝聚力. 12
2.3 研究假設 13
2.3.1 遊憩體驗與親子關係相關研究 . 3
2.3.2 親子關係與家庭凝聚力相關研究 14
2.3.3 情感交流的中介作用 15
2.3.4 相互信任的中介作用 15
2.3.5 友誼型交往的中介作用 16
2.4 研究架構 17
第三章 研究方法 18
3.1 問卷設計. 18
3.2 量表設計 .. 19
3.2.1 遊憩體驗量表 19
3.2.2 親子關係量表 20
3.2.3 家庭凝聚力量表 21
3.3 問卷收集計劃 22
3.3.1 確立樣本數. 22
3.3.2 正式調研計畫 . 22
3.4 資料分析計劃 23
3.4.1 SPSS 數據分析 23
3.4.2 SmartPLS 數據分析 . 24
第四章 研究分析結果與討論 25
4.1 描述性統計分析 25
4.2 信度分析 27
4.2.1 心理體驗量表信度檢驗 . 28
4.2.2 環境體驗信度檢驗. 28
4.2.3 自我成長體驗信度檢驗 29
4.2.4 情感交流信度檢驗 30
4.2.5 相互信任信度檢驗 31
4.2.6 友誼型交往信度檢驗. 31
4.2.7 家庭凝聚力信度檢驗 . 32
4.3 效度分析 33
4.3.1 內容效度 33
4.3.2 結構效度 33
4.3.3 心理體驗效度分析 .. 34
4.3.4 環境體驗效度分析 35
4.3.5 自我成長體驗效度分析 . 35
4.3.6 情感交流效度分析 36
4.3.7 相互信任效度分析 36
4.3.8 友誼型交往效度分析. 37
4.3.9 家庭凝聚力效度分析 37
4.3.10 收斂效度 38
4.4 結構方程模型分析. 39
4.4.1 模型構建 . 40
4.4.2 結構方程模型運行結果 40
第五章 結論與討論 45
5.1 研究結論 45
5.1.1 遊憩體驗對與情感交流關係 . 45
5.1.2. 遊憩體驗與相互信任的關係 46
5.1.3 遊憩體驗與友誼型交往關係 47
5.1.4 情感交流與家庭凝聚力關係 48
5.1.5 相互信任與家庭凝聚力的關係 . 49
5.1.6 友誼型交往與家庭凝聚力關係 49
5.2 理論貢獻 50
5.3 實際貢獻. 51
5.3.1 對政府方面 51
5.3.2 對旅遊業者方面 51
5.3.3 對家長方面 52
5.4 建議 52
5.4.1 建設更多的親子遊憩設施 52
5.4.2 制定促進親子遊支持計畫 52
5.4.3 加強宣傳促進家庭親子活動 53
5.4.4 提升景區綜合服務品質 53
5.4.5 設計適合多代共遊的產品 54
5.4.6 注重家庭互動體驗 . 54
5.4.7 合理安排親子遊行程時長 54
5.5 研究局限 55
參考文獻 56
作者簡歷 61
附 錄. 62
1.Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2022). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting UX Metrics. Morgan Kaufmann.
2.Bagarozzi, D. A. (1985). Family measurement techniques: Locke marital adjustment scale and the dyadic adjustment scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 13(3), 66-71.
3.Bigné, J. E., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2005). The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism management, 26(6), 833-844.
4.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 32(7), 513.
5.Buist, K. L., Verhoeven, M., Hoksbergen, R., ter Laak, J., Watve, S., & Paranjpe, A. (2017). Associations of perceived sibling and parent-child relationship quality with internalizing and externalizing problems: Comparing Indian and Dutch early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(8), 1163-1190.
6.Chen, C.-J., & Li, W.-C. (2020). A study on the hot spring leisure experience and happiness of Generation X and Generation Y in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(1), 39-51.
7.Chesworth, N. (2003). The family vacation: a double‐edged sword. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(4), 346-348.
8.Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (2013). Economics of outdoor recreation. Routledge. Codina, N., & 9.Pestana, J. V. (2019). Time matters differently in leisure experience for men and women: Leisure dedication and time perspective. International Journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2513.
10.Dai, P., Zhang, W., & Chen, Q. (2023). Analysis of the Task-Driven Instruction Method of the Course “Statistics” Based on SPSS. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Wisdom Education and Service Management (HWESM 2023),
11.Driver, B., & Tocher, S. R. (1970). Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreation engagements with implications for planning. Elements of outdoor recreation planning, 9-31.
12.Driver, B. L., & Tocher, S. R. (2019). Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreational engagements with implications for planning. In Land and Leisure(pp. 86-104). Routledge.
13.Durko, A. M., & Petrick, J. F. (2013). Family and relationship benefits of travel experiences: A literature review. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 720-730.
14.Gao, M., Havitz, M. E., & Potwarka, L. R. (2021). Exploring the influence of family holiday travel on the subjective well-being of Chinese adolescents. In Family, Children, and Tourism in China (pp. 45-61). Routledge.
15.Guo, X., & Liu, T. (2022). The psychological process and emotional cognition of children's tourism experiences in Chinese family culture. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 960534.
16.Hadley, L. V., Naylor, G., & Hamilton, A. F. d. C. (2022). A review of theories and methods in the science of face-to-face social interaction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 42-54.
17.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
18.Hong, R. Y., Tan, C. S., Lee, S. S., Tan, S.-H., Tsai, F.-F., Poh, X.-T., Zhou, Y., Sum, E. L., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Interactive effects of parental personality and child temperament with parenting and family cohesion. Parenting, 15(2), 92-118.
19.Hu, J., Ou, C., Zhang, M., & Cao, X. (2023). Adult children traveling with parents: exploring travel conflict and parents’ subjective well-being. Tourism Review,78(1), 101-121.
20.Inan Nur, A., B. Santoso, H., & O. Hadi Putra, P. (2021). The method and metric of user experience evaluation: a systematic literature review. 2021 10th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications,
21.Ingkadijaya, R., Damanik, J., & Putra, H. (2016). Tourist activities contribution on family cohesion. Heritage, Culture and Society: Research agenda and best practices in the hospitality and tourism industry, 345-350.
22.Karagöz, D., & Uysal, M. (2023). The consequences of self-identification: examples from–two recreation experience settings. Leisure Sciences, 1-22.
23.Kelly, C. (2022). Beyond ‘a trip to the seaside’: Exploring emotions and family tourism experiences. Tourism geographies, 24(2-3), 284-305.
24.Kelly, J. R. (2019). Freedom to be: A new sociology of leisure. Routledge.
25.Lee, K.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021). Cognitive appraisal theory, memorable tourism experiences, and family cohesion in rural travel. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(4), 399-412.
26.Lehto, X. Y., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, Y., & Choi, S. (2012). Family vacation activities and family cohesion. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29(8), 835-850.
27.Li, Y. (2000). Geographical consciousness and tourism experience. Annals of tourism research, 27(4), 863-883.
28.Lo, S.-t. D. (2008). The theme park experience: its nature, antecedents and consequences.
29.Matteucci, X., Volić, I., & Filep, S. (2022). Dimensions of friendship in shared travel experiences. Leisure Sciences, 44(6), 697-714.
30.Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of family therapy, 22(2), 144-167.
31.Parker, S. (2021). The sociology of leisure. Routledge.Presas, P., Guia, J., & Muñoz, D. (2014). Customer’s perception of familiness in travel experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31(2), 147-161.
32.Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021). Analisis data penelitian marketing: perbandingan hasil antara amos, smartpls, warppls, dan spss untuk jumlah sampel besar. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research,2(4), 216-227.
33.Qi, W., Shi, J., & Cui, L. (2022). Parental Optimism Improves Youth Psychological Well-Being: Family Cohesion and Youth Optimism as Serial Mediators. Healthcare,
34.Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
35.Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.
36.Sun, W., Chou, C.-P., Stacy, A. W., Ma, H., Unger, J., & Gallaher, P. (2007). SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach’s alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items. Behavior research methods, 39, 71-81.
37.Taylor, L. K., Townsend, D., Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2019). Adolescent civic engagement and perceived political conflict: The role of family cohesion. Youth & Society, 51(5), 616-637.
38.Veal, A. (2019). The serious leisure perspective and the experience of leisure. In Contemporary Issues in Leisure Sciences (pp. 36-54). Routledge.
39.Wang, J. Z., Mott, S., Magwood, O., Mathew, C., Mclellan, A., Kpade, V., Gaba, P., Kozloff, N., Pottie, K., & Andermann, A. (2019). The impact of interventions for youth experiencing homelessness on housing, mental health, substance use, and family cohesion: a systematic review. BMC public health, 19, 1-22.
40.Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Family identity bundles and holiday decision making. Journal of Travel Research, 60(3), 486-502.
41.Winter, P. L., Selin, S., Cerveny, L., & Bricker, K. (2019). Outdoor recreation, nature-based tourism, and sustainability. Sustainability, 12(1), 81.
42.Xiang, G., Li, Q., Du, X., Liu, X., Xiao, M., & Chen, H. (2020). Links between family cohesion and subjective well-being in adolescents and early adults: The mediating role of self-concept clarity and hope. Current Psychology, 1-10.
43.Yao, Y., Jia, G., Lin, P. M., & Huang, J. (2020). Young adult children traveling with parents: Insights on conflict and its causes. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(6), 727-738.
44.Zahra, S. T., & Saleem, S. (2021). The development of a family cohesion scale: A preliminary validation. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 120-131.
45.Zvonkovic, A. M., Swenson, A. V., & Cornwell, Z. (2017). Children's experiences of time when a parent travels for work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(4), 983-1000.
46.畢賽雲, 李兵, 韓玉婷, & 石金蓮. (2019). 基於文本分析的國家公園親子遊憩體驗研究——以武夷山國家公園試點區為例. 北京林業大學學報 (社會科學版), 18(1), 118-123.
47.邊昊天, 邊玉芳, & 梁麗嬋. (2022). 父母養育倦怠對家庭凝聚力的影響：親子關係的中介作用及差異. 第二十四屆全國心理學學術會議, 中國河南新鄉.
48.陳小龍, & 王凱. (2018). “遛娃” 時代背景下鄉村親子遊的特點及開發新對策. 河北旅遊職業學院學報, 23(3), 34-37.
49.樊友猛, & 謝彥君. (2017). “體驗” 的內涵與旅遊體驗屬性新探. Tourism Tribune/Lvyou Xuekan, 32(11).
50.方航, & 陳前恒. (2020). 社會互動效應研究進展. 經濟學動態(5), 117-131.
51.方怡堯. (2001). 溫泉遊客遊憩涉入與遊憩體驗關係之研究-以北投溫泉為例.
52.幹鵬程. (2019). 顧客體驗對感知價值和顧客忠誠的影響. 江蘇商論(9), 8-11.
53.官喬琪, 孫慧芳, & 潘雪幸. (2022). 家庭凝聚力之概念分析. 長庚護理, 33(2), 29-37.
54.李海雲, & 劉潞. (2020). 我國家庭親子關係研究進展. 教育理論與實踐, 40(17), 19-22.
55.李菊霞, & 林翔. (2008). 親子遊市場若干問題探討. 企業活力(12), 32-33.
56.李陽陽, & 吳軍. (2023). 城市親子遊市場調研及開發策略研究——以日照市為例. Geographical Science Research, 12, 496.
57.劉妍, 張欣然, & 程慶. (2015). 中國親子旅遊研究綜述. 旅遊縱覽 (下半月), 4, 79r80-82.
58.劉宗幸. (2022). 親子心理健康的代間傳遞: 初探家庭凝聚力之中介效果. 國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 18(1), 47-72.
59.柳建坤, 何曉斌, & 張雲亮. (2021). 體育鍛煉, 親子關係與青少年心理健康. 中國青年研究, 103.
60.任曉麗, 鐘士恩, 黃佩紅, & 張碩. (2019). 基於家庭系統理論的親子旅遊動機測量研究——以南京市紅山森林動物園為例. 人文地理, 34(2), 152-160.
61.田菲菲, & 田錄梅. (2014). 親子關係, 朋友關係影響問題行為的 3 種模型. 心理科學進展, 22(6), 968.
62.田芙蓉, 楊韞, & 顏麒. (2013). “顧客體驗” 理論及其在旅遊應用研究中的發展與不足. 經濟問題探索(8), 113-117.
63.吳承照, 馬林志, & 詹立. (2010). 戶外遊憩體驗品質評價研究——以上海城市公園自行車活動為例. 旅遊科學, 24(1), 45-51.
64.吳旻, 劉爭光, & 梁麗嬋. (2016). 親子關係對兒童青少年心理發展的影響. 北京師範大學學報: 社會科學版(5), 55-63.
65.謝暢. (2020). 親子旅遊體驗品質對親子關係的影響 [碩士, 南京師範大學]
66.嚴海, 張文萍, 李娜, & 靳露寧. (2017). 基於兒童特性和動機的親子假日出行機理研究. 武漢理工大學學報, 39(3), 45-52.
67.易柳夙, & 吳茂英. (2020). 家庭旅遊研究進展--基於 2000-2019 年英文文獻的綜述. Tourism Tribune/Lvyou Xuekan, 35(4).
68.鐘士恩, 任曉麗, 顏丙金, 彭紅松, & 黃佩紅. (2018). 親子旅遊, 親子關係與兒童的旅遊世界. 人文地理, 33(4), 13-19.
69.鐘士恩, 徐彩霞, 顏丙金, 黃佩紅, & 彭紅松. (2020). 從個體旅遊到群體旅遊: 共同在場下的城市家庭親子旅遊行為研究. 人文地理, 35(1), 141-149.
70.周詳, 孫澤儀, & 劉軒軒. (2022). 數字足跡支援下的歷史性城市景觀空間感知與遊憩體驗研究. New Architecture, 1(1).
71.陸雅卉. (2023) .高雄市共融公園親子遊憩體驗、休閒涉入與滿意度之研究 [碩士, 大仁科技大學]
72.陳穎萱. (2018) .休閒體驗、親子關係與幸福感之關係研究-以雲林縣國小學童家長家庭旅遊為例 [碩士, 國立虎尾科技大學]
73.趙小君. (2012) .台東縣國小學童家長親子休閒運動滿意度、親子關係及幸福感之研究 [碩士, 大仁科技大學]
2.Bagarozzi, D. A. (1985). Family measurement techniques: Locke marital adjustment scale and the dyadic adjustment scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 13(3), 66-71.
3.Bigné, J. E., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2005). The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism management, 26(6), 833-844.
4.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 32(7), 513.
5.Buist, K. L., Verhoeven, M., Hoksbergen, R., ter Laak, J., Watve, S., & Paranjpe, A. (2017). Associations of perceived sibling and parent-child relationship quality with internalizing and externalizing problems: Comparing Indian and Dutch early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(8), 1163-1190.
6.Chen, C.-J., & Li, W.-C. (2020). A study on the hot spring leisure experience and happiness of Generation X and Generation Y in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(1), 39-51.
7.Chesworth, N. (2003). The family vacation: a double‐edged sword. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(4), 346-348.
8.Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (2013). Economics of outdoor recreation. Routledge. Codina, N., & 9.Pestana, J. V. (2019). Time matters differently in leisure experience for men and women: Leisure dedication and time perspective. International Journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2513.
10.Dai, P., Zhang, W., & Chen, Q. (2023). Analysis of the Task-Driven Instruction Method of the Course “Statistics” Based on SPSS. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Wisdom Education and Service Management (HWESM 2023),
11.Driver, B., & Tocher, S. R. (1970). Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreation engagements with implications for planning. Elements of outdoor recreation planning, 9-31.
12.Driver, B. L., & Tocher, S. R. (2019). Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreational engagements with implications for planning. In Land and Leisure(pp. 86-104). Routledge.
13.Durko, A. M., & Petrick, J. F. (2013). Family and relationship benefits of travel experiences: A literature review. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 720-730.
14.Gao, M., Havitz, M. E., & Potwarka, L. R. (2021). Exploring the influence of family holiday travel on the subjective well-being of Chinese adolescents. In Family, Children, and Tourism in China (pp. 45-61). Routledge.
15.Guo, X., & Liu, T. (2022). The psychological process and emotional cognition of children's tourism experiences in Chinese family culture. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 960534.
16.Hadley, L. V., Naylor, G., & Hamilton, A. F. d. C. (2022). A review of theories and methods in the science of face-to-face social interaction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 42-54.
17.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
18.Hong, R. Y., Tan, C. S., Lee, S. S., Tan, S.-H., Tsai, F.-F., Poh, X.-T., Zhou, Y., Sum, E. L., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Interactive effects of parental personality and child temperament with parenting and family cohesion. Parenting, 15(2), 92-118.
19.Hu, J., Ou, C., Zhang, M., & Cao, X. (2023). Adult children traveling with parents: exploring travel conflict and parents’ subjective well-being. Tourism Review,78(1), 101-121.
20.Inan Nur, A., B. Santoso, H., & O. Hadi Putra, P. (2021). The method and metric of user experience evaluation: a systematic literature review. 2021 10th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications,
21.Ingkadijaya, R., Damanik, J., & Putra, H. (2016). Tourist activities contribution on family cohesion. Heritage, Culture and Society: Research agenda and best practices in the hospitality and tourism industry, 345-350.
22.Karagöz, D., & Uysal, M. (2023). The consequences of self-identification: examples from–two recreation experience settings. Leisure Sciences, 1-22.
23.Kelly, C. (2022). Beyond ‘a trip to the seaside’: Exploring emotions and family tourism experiences. Tourism geographies, 24(2-3), 284-305.
24.Kelly, J. R. (2019). Freedom to be: A new sociology of leisure. Routledge.
25.Lee, K.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021). Cognitive appraisal theory, memorable tourism experiences, and family cohesion in rural travel. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(4), 399-412.
26.Lehto, X. Y., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, Y., & Choi, S. (2012). Family vacation activities and family cohesion. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29(8), 835-850.
27.Li, Y. (2000). Geographical consciousness and tourism experience. Annals of tourism research, 27(4), 863-883.
28.Lo, S.-t. D. (2008). The theme park experience: its nature, antecedents and consequences.
29.Matteucci, X., Volić, I., & Filep, S. (2022). Dimensions of friendship in shared travel experiences. Leisure Sciences, 44(6), 697-714.
30.Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of family therapy, 22(2), 144-167.
31.Parker, S. (2021). The sociology of leisure. Routledge.Presas, P., Guia, J., & Muñoz, D. (2014). Customer’s perception of familiness in travel experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31(2), 147-161.
32.Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021). Analisis data penelitian marketing: perbandingan hasil antara amos, smartpls, warppls, dan spss untuk jumlah sampel besar. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research,2(4), 216-227.
33.Qi, W., Shi, J., & Cui, L. (2022). Parental Optimism Improves Youth Psychological Well-Being: Family Cohesion and Youth Optimism as Serial Mediators. Healthcare,
34.Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
35.Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.
36.Sun, W., Chou, C.-P., Stacy, A. W., Ma, H., Unger, J., & Gallaher, P. (2007). SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach’s alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items. Behavior research methods, 39, 71-81.
37.Taylor, L. K., Townsend, D., Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2019). Adolescent civic engagement and perceived political conflict: The role of family cohesion. Youth & Society, 51(5), 616-637.
38.Veal, A. (2019). The serious leisure perspective and the experience of leisure. In Contemporary Issues in Leisure Sciences (pp. 36-54). Routledge.
39.Wang, J. Z., Mott, S., Magwood, O., Mathew, C., Mclellan, A., Kpade, V., Gaba, P., Kozloff, N., Pottie, K., & Andermann, A. (2019). The impact of interventions for youth experiencing homelessness on housing, mental health, substance use, and family cohesion: a systematic review. BMC public health, 19, 1-22.
40.Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Family identity bundles and holiday decision making. Journal of Travel Research, 60(3), 486-502.
41.Winter, P. L., Selin, S., Cerveny, L., & Bricker, K. (2019). Outdoor recreation, nature-based tourism, and sustainability. Sustainability, 12(1), 81.
42.Xiang, G., Li, Q., Du, X., Liu, X., Xiao, M., & Chen, H. (2020). Links between family cohesion and subjective well-being in adolescents and early adults: The mediating role of self-concept clarity and hope. Current Psychology, 1-10.
43.Yao, Y., Jia, G., Lin, P. M., & Huang, J. (2020). Young adult children traveling with parents: Insights on conflict and its causes. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(6), 727-738.
44.Zahra, S. T., & Saleem, S. (2021). The development of a family cohesion scale: A preliminary validation. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 120-131.
45.Zvonkovic, A. M., Swenson, A. V., & Cornwell, Z. (2017). Children's experiences of time when a parent travels for work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(4), 983-1000.
46.畢賽雲, 李兵, 韓玉婷, & 石金蓮. (2019). 基於文本分析的國家公園親子遊憩體驗研究——以武夷山國家公園試點區為例. 北京林業大學學報 (社會科學版), 18(1), 118-123.
47.邊昊天, 邊玉芳, & 梁麗嬋. (2022). 父母養育倦怠對家庭凝聚力的影響：親子關係的中介作用及差異. 第二十四屆全國心理學學術會議, 中國河南新鄉.
48.陳小龍, & 王凱. (2018). “遛娃” 時代背景下鄉村親子遊的特點及開發新對策. 河北旅遊職業學院學報, 23(3), 34-37.
49.樊友猛, & 謝彥君. (2017). “體驗” 的內涵與旅遊體驗屬性新探. Tourism Tribune/Lvyou Xuekan, 32(11).
50.方航, & 陳前恒. (2020). 社會互動效應研究進展. 經濟學動態(5), 117-131.
51.方怡堯. (2001). 溫泉遊客遊憩涉入與遊憩體驗關係之研究-以北投溫泉為例.
52.幹鵬程. (2019). 顧客體驗對感知價值和顧客忠誠的影響. 江蘇商論(9), 8-11.
53.官喬琪, 孫慧芳, & 潘雪幸. (2022). 家庭凝聚力之概念分析. 長庚護理, 33(2), 29-37.
54.李海雲, & 劉潞. (2020). 我國家庭親子關係研究進展. 教育理論與實踐, 40(17), 19-22.
55.李菊霞, & 林翔. (2008). 親子遊市場若干問題探討. 企業活力(12), 32-33.
56.李陽陽, & 吳軍. (2023). 城市親子遊市場調研及開發策略研究——以日照市為例. Geographical Science Research, 12, 496.
57.劉妍, 張欣然, & 程慶. (2015). 中國親子旅遊研究綜述. 旅遊縱覽 (下半月), 4, 79r80-82.
58.劉宗幸. (2022). 親子心理健康的代間傳遞: 初探家庭凝聚力之中介效果. 國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 18(1), 47-72.
59.柳建坤, 何曉斌, & 張雲亮. (2021). 體育鍛煉, 親子關係與青少年心理健康. 中國青年研究, 103.
60.任曉麗, 鐘士恩, 黃佩紅, & 張碩. (2019). 基於家庭系統理論的親子旅遊動機測量研究——以南京市紅山森林動物園為例. 人文地理, 34(2), 152-160.
61.田菲菲, & 田錄梅. (2014). 親子關係, 朋友關係影響問題行為的 3 種模型. 心理科學進展, 22(6), 968.
62.田芙蓉, 楊韞, & 顏麒. (2013). “顧客體驗” 理論及其在旅遊應用研究中的發展與不足. 經濟問題探索(8), 113-117.
63.吳承照, 馬林志, & 詹立. (2010). 戶外遊憩體驗品質評價研究——以上海城市公園自行車活動為例. 旅遊科學, 24(1), 45-51.
64.吳旻, 劉爭光, & 梁麗嬋. (2016). 親子關係對兒童青少年心理發展的影響. 北京師範大學學報: 社會科學版(5), 55-63.
65.謝暢. (2020). 親子旅遊體驗品質對親子關係的影響 [碩士, 南京師範大學]
66.嚴海, 張文萍, 李娜, & 靳露寧. (2017). 基於兒童特性和動機的親子假日出行機理研究. 武漢理工大學學報, 39(3), 45-52.
67.易柳夙, & 吳茂英. (2020). 家庭旅遊研究進展--基於 2000-2019 年英文文獻的綜述. Tourism Tribune/Lvyou Xuekan, 35(4).
68.鐘士恩, 任曉麗, 顏丙金, 彭紅松, & 黃佩紅. (2018). 親子旅遊, 親子關係與兒童的旅遊世界. 人文地理, 33(4), 13-19.
69.鐘士恩, 徐彩霞, 顏丙金, 黃佩紅, & 彭紅松. (2020). 從個體旅遊到群體旅遊: 共同在場下的城市家庭親子旅遊行為研究. 人文地理, 35(1), 141-149.
70.周詳, 孫澤儀, & 劉軒軒. (2022). 數字足跡支援下的歷史性城市景觀空間感知與遊憩體驗研究. New Architecture, 1(1).
71.陸雅卉. (2023) .高雄市共融公園親子遊憩體驗、休閒涉入與滿意度之研究 [碩士, 大仁科技大學]
72.陳穎萱. (2018) .休閒體驗、親子關係與幸福感之關係研究-以雲林縣國小學童家長家庭旅遊為例 [碩士, 國立虎尾科技大學]
73.趙小君. (2012) .台東縣國小學童家長親子休閒運動滿意度、親子關係及幸福感之研究 [碩士, 大仁科技大學]
